SILENT NIGHT,
DEADLY NIGHT (1984)
The plot: A kid watches a robber dressed as Santa kill his mom and dad, gets beat up by a nun in an orphanage, becomes a toy store Santa, goes nuts, impales Linnea Quigley on deer antlers. Based on the Charles Dickens classic.
The poop: This is one troublesome pup, let me tell you. I'm of two minds on this film, really. On one hand, as a parent, my copy of SNDN goes on one of the tippity-top shelves, far away from little hands. So I easily understand the apocalyptic backlash SNDN provoked upon its original release, and I'm actually sympathetic toward those who stood out in the cold to picket and protest it's release.
The plot: A kid watches a robber dressed as Santa kill his mom and dad, gets beat up by a nun in an orphanage, becomes a toy store Santa, goes nuts, impales Linnea Quigley on deer antlers. Based on the Charles Dickens classic.
The poop: This is one troublesome pup, let me tell you. I'm of two minds on this film, really. On one hand, as a parent, my copy of SNDN goes on one of the tippity-top shelves, far away from little hands. So I easily understand the apocalyptic backlash SNDN provoked upon its original release, and I'm actually sympathetic toward those who stood out in the cold to picket and protest it's release.
But on the other
hand, this is a textbook, pitch-perfect example of an exploitation film, right
down to the ad campaign, which is what triggered the protests in the first
place. You have the exploitable hook (killer Santa), button-pushing
transgressions (cops shooting multiple
Santa's, abusive nun, killer Santa
giving a very special present to a good little girl, etc.) and nudity (hi
Linnea Quigley!). From an exploitation movie standpoint, there is very little
SNDN doesn't have.
And that ad
campaign! It really was quite genius, in an exploitation sort of way. Show the
TV-ads for maybe a week, clearly showcasing the maniac Santa, during
family-friendly prime-time, and let the outraged parents of America give you an
extra couple weeks of free advertising due to news coverage of the pickets and
protests. And to think this came out of a major studio, Tri-Star (owned by
Columbia Pictures, then owned by Coca-Cola). Of course, the Coca-Cola
shareholders didn't go along and pulled the picture from release.
All well and
good, you say, but how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln? Well, SNDN is pretty
dreadful from a quality standpoint, even from an exploitation movie standpoint.
Most of the acting is distractingly bad. The direction is haphazard and lazy.
The sets are cheap, including the rattiest excuse for a toy store I've ever
seen outside of a flea market. The Christmas songs (all recorded especially for
this movie -none of that crappy public domain junk) are bizarre at best,
headache-inducing at worst. And whenever legitimately transgressive subject
matter is introduced, it's rendered null and void by everything I've just
listed, and probably more.
So, needless to
say, I'm vastly and consistently entertained by SNDN. It's a train-wreck, yes
indeed, but it's such a stupid and consistently goofy train-wreck that it's
impossible to take seriously. The incompetence on display makes even the most offensive moments seem silly. I can't explain it and I won't apologize for it,
but I have a serious sweet-tooth for junk like this.
Deal-breakers: Yeah, I don't think I really need to spell it out for you any more than I already have.
Deal-breakers: Yeah, I don't think I really need to spell it out for you any more than I already have.
The up-side: Ditto.
Makes a great double-bill with: Booze.
Other stuff:
Everyone relax, I don't plan on even telling my daughter this film exists, much
less letting her watch it before she's twenty-five.
Back when this first came out, I remember feeling a little nauseated at the premise...just didn't seem necessary. And at the time I was too young to have seen it anyway. Finally watched it this year (2013). Funny - clearly somebody just trying to make a buck. Although - I was too busy looking at grown up Santa to notice a nude woman... ;)
ReplyDelete